Australia Officially Bans Social Media For Under-16s, Should India Make A Similar Move Next?

Add as a preferred source on Google

Australia's long-debated social media age law officially kicked in on 10 December 2025. The rule is simple: if you're under 16, you can't have an account on major platforms. The responsibility doesn't fall on kids or parents, it's on the companies themselves.

This new law sits under the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, passed late last year. From today, platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, X, Reddit, Twitch, Kick and Threads must block access for under-16 users and remove existing accounts that fall under that age.

Why The Government Pushed For It

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese marked the rollout with a video message calling it "a day when families are taking back power from big tech." His argument has been consistent: kids deserve a childhood that's not shaped by algorithm-driven pressure, constant comparison, or easy access to harmful content.

He has said repeatedly that the aim is not punishment but protection, and the ban is being pitched as a step toward limiting cyberbullying, mental-health strain, grooming risks and addictive design features.

How Platforms Are Expected To Enforce It

The law doesn't spell out a single prescribed method. Instead, companies must take "reasonable steps" to stop kids under 16 from creating or using accounts. That could mean a mix of:

• age-estimation tools
• behaviour-based signals
• tighter sign-up flows
• ID checks in some cases

Failure to comply could cost companies up to A$49.5 million in penalties. Importantly, the law also doesn't force companies to verify everyone's age with formal ID, nor does it set an exact target for how many under-16 accounts need to be caught and removed. That gap is what critics say could make enforcement patchy.

Should India Consider a Similar Ban?

Whether India should follow Australia's model is complicated, because the context here is very different. On one hand, the idea of shielding children from harmful content, cyberbullying and addictive design sounds reasonable-especially in a country where smartphones reach kids earlier than ever. But a blanket ban may not fit India's scale, digital habits or socio-economic realities. Millions of students rely on YouTube for free learning, use social platforms to build skills, or find communities they don't have offline.

The bigger issue in India isn't access-it's the lack of strong safety standards, digital literacy, and accountability from platforms. Rather than a full ban, a more practical approach may be stronger age-verification tools, safer algorithms for minors, digital-wellbeing education in schools, and stricter penalties for platforms that ignore harmful content. India needs a solution that protects children without cutting them off from opportunities that, for many, exist primarily online.

The Pushback And Concerns On The Australia Ban

Not everyone is convinced this is the right approach. Platforms argue the ban is rushed and might be unrealistic to enforce consistently. Tech analysts point out that teenagers are resourceful and may simply move to VPNs, secondary email accounts, or lesser-known apps not explicitly listed.

Others worry the ban removes access to supportive digital communities, learning resources, creative outlets and peer networks especially for kids who don't always find those spaces offline.

There's also the broader debate about age-verification technology: how accurate it is, how invasive it feels, and whether it introduces new privacy risks.

Why The World Is Watching

Australia is officially the first country to implement a nationwide ban of this scale. Governments in Europe, parts of Asia, and the United States are following the rollout closely. For some, Australia is a test case for whether a giant move like this can genuinely reduce harm. For others, it raises questions about digital rights and the balance between safety and autonomy. Either way, the outcome here is likely to shape policy conversations across the world.

Where This Leaves Families And Teens Today

For now, teens under 16 will find their access blocked on major platforms as enforcement tools start rolling out. Parents won't face penalties, and kids won't face fines. The pressure is entirely on companies to comply.

What happens next depends on whether the ban works in practice, how platforms adapt, and how young people respond. Some might log off without much fuss. Others will look for workarounds. And many families will be left renegotiating what online life looks like from here.

Australia has taken a bold, controversial step, one that's already sparking global conversation. Whether it transforms childhood for the better or introduces a new set of complications will unfold in the coming months. But for now, one thing is clear: the relationship between young people and social media is entering a new, closely watched chapter.