Latest Updates
-
Daily Horoscope, Dec 22, 2025: Libra to Pisces; Astrological Prediction for all Zodiac Signs -
Mahayuti Sweeps Maharashtra Local Body Polls, BJP Emerges Largest Party -
The World’s First Harry Potter-Themed Hotel Is All Set to Open In Europe -
Dhurandhar 16 Days Collection | Dhurandhar Beats Jawan, Stree 2 | Dhurandhar 500cr | Dhurandhar Day 16 Collection | Dhurandhar Box Office Collection Day 17 Prediction (December 21, 2025) | Dhurandhar Third Weekend Collection Prediction | Dhurandhar Today Collection -
How to Dress Well This Holiday Season Without Overthinking It -
From Guava To Kiwi: Fruits to Have in Winters to Boost Your Immunity -
David Guetta Returns to Mumbai After 8 Years, Lights Up Sunburn Festival 2025 -
How Homeopathic Remedies May Support Gut and Brain Health, Expert Explains -
Why Viral Fevers Are Lasting Longer This Year: Expert Explains The Immunity Shift Post-COVID -
Rekha’s Timeless Wedding Season Style: 5 Things to Pick From Her Latest Look
Don't waste money for anti wrinkle creams
EW YORK, Dec 13 (Reuters) Spend a fortune on anti-wrinkle creams? Don't bother, said a US study.
Luxury-price products don't work any better than drugstore brands, according to the study by Consumer Reports magazine, released yesterday which ranked Olay Regenerist, priced at about 19 dollars, as the most effective in reducing wrinkles.
But none of these products made a significant difference in the skin's appearance.
Researchers found that after 12 weeks the top-rated products smoothed out some fine lines and wrinkles, but even the best performers reduced the average depth of wrinkles by less than 10 per cent, a change barely visible to the naked eye.
''The tests revealed that, on average, these products made little difference the skin's appearance and there's no correlation between price and effectiveness,'' a spokeswoman for the magazine said.
Americans spend over 1 billion dollars a year on anti-wrinkle creams.
Consumer Reports, published by nonprofit consumer research group Consumer Union, chose a sample of top-selling mass-market lines for its study. The products were purchased in retail stores for between 19 dollars and 355 dollars. 17 to 23 women, aged between 30 and 70, tested each cream.
The women were recruited and evaluated by a European laboratory specializing in cosmetic testing.
The women used a test product on one side of their face and the lab's standard moisturizer on the other side for comparison. A high-tech optical device was used to detect changes in wrinkle depth and skin roughness.
Results varied among the women, the study said.
Dr Tina Alster, a dermatologic laser surgeon from Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC, and a member of the American Academy of Dermatologists, said it was overly simplistic to conclude from such a limited study that these products did not work.
''People would love to believe that cheap products are the same as the more expensive ones, and I may pooh-pooh someone paying 500 dollar for a cream, but I do see the value of some of the luxury brands which are science-based,'' she said. ''But it is a cautionary tale that people should be looking at the ingredients rather than just at the packaging.'' Despite the study's findings, some women said they would continue to use anti-wrinkle cream.
''I've
never
really
believed
these
creams
would
stop
wrinkles,
but
they
make
me
feel
and
smell
good,''
said
Amira
Thoron,
a
36-year-old
New
York
teacher.



Click it and Unblock the Notifications











